Re: [sdpd] Hump ???

[Leonid Solovyov <l_solovyov...@yahoo.com>]

> The mystery is now evenmore thick... I recorded a
> new pattern this night, without sample, and it is
> confirmed that the single-humped camel (with sample)
> tranformed into a nice double-humped camel (without
> sample), periodical, d=4.4A...

So, the experiment without sample was not useless ? now having two
humps you may double the moral compensation sum from Bruker :)

I would also try to perform a zero-2theta scan instead of theta-2theta
to exclude the primary beam scattering on the sample holder device and
see the result. 
The most radical solution would be to assemble a small portable
beam-stop with a manual holder, move the detector to the hump position
and put the beam-stop at different places along the primary beam path
checking the intensity by the intensimeter. I do not know, however, if
Bruker D8 allows such a manual invasion.

Regards,
Leonid

P.S. Why do you measure at nights only ? to exclude the sun wind
influence? :)




	
		
__________________________________ 
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! 
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web 
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own computers.
At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EA3HyD/3MnJAA/79vVAA/UIYolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    sdpd-unsubscribe...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/