[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[sdpd] C4H4CuAlCl4
- To: sdpd... @egroups.com
- Subject: [sdpd] C4H4CuAlCl4
- From: Armel Le Bail <armel... @fluo.univ-lemans.fr>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 09:10:34 +0200
- Delivered-to: listsaver-egroups-sdpd... @egroups.com
- Mailing-list: contact sdpd-owner... @egroups.com
- Reply-to: sdpd... @egroups.com
Let us continue this crowdy discussion.
Some new results on C4H4CuAlCl4 :
Using the molecule location option in ESPOIR,
with a CuAlCl4 model taken from the CuAlCl4C6H6
structure in CSD, one may obtain Rp(F)=33% in
the P212121 space group previously suggested.
Refining this model with FULLPROF leads to :
Cu 0.0873 1.0014 -0.0061
Al 0.2419 0.8388 0.2950
Cl1 0.1090 1.0064 0.2448
Cl2 0.2356 0.8555 0.4783
Cl3 0.3989 0.9100 0.2402
Cl4 0.2207 0.5607 0.2418
=> Cell parameters :
12.65127 0.00258
7.21250 0.00185
12.19595 0.00222
=> Conventional Rietveld R-factors ==>
=> Rp: 35.9 Rwp: 29.2 Rexp: 28.59 Chi2: 1.04
=> Bragg R-factor: 25.9 Vol: 1112.846( 0.418)
=> Rf-factor= 22.4
The refinement includes a constraint on Al-Cl distances.
Fourier difference by SHELXL or searching C atoms
from scratch by ESPOIR then suggest positions
for the remaining atoms. However, they may be ghosts
since interatomic distances are not very satisfying.
The question is (I am not a very good in organic
chemistry :-() what is the C4H4 arrangement : two C2H2
or a single linear C4H4 ???
Best,
Armel