Thomas Koehler wrote:
in principle I have no problem with a rietveld usegroup instead of a mailing
list. But I am somewhat unhappy with the location at bionet: I'm a
completely "anorganic" user of the Rietveld technique and my concern is,
that the discussion will be biased toward organic crystallography. This
exactly is the point why I don't read science.techniques.crystallography:
90% of the contributions to the list (at least at that time) were protein
crystallography or similar stuff which were not very interesting for me.
Quirina Roode replies:
I am in full agreement with Thomas here. The possibility of getting
swamped with biological and organic crystallography is definitely not
favourable for my area of research. Otherwise I support Lachlan for
all the nice extra facilities that will be possible with a newsgroup.
Thanks Lachlan.
Best wishes,
Quirina
\|||/
(o o)
*--------oOO--(_)--OOo--------*
Quirina I. Roode
PhD student: Cement Chemistry
*-----------------------------*
Department of Civil Engineering
University of the Witwatersrand
P O Wits, 2050, Johannesburg
SOUTH AFRICA
*-----------------------------*
ROODE@civen.civil.wits.ac.za
Tel: +27-(0)11-716-2478 (w)
Fax: +27-(0)11-339-1762 (w)
*---------/ \Oooo.----------*
.oooO ( )
( ) ) /
\ ( (_/
\_)