[resent on behalf of Harry Powell - listserv seems to be discarding messages. So if you message does not appear - send it to me and I will reforward it] Hi 1) Since the last School was almost universally well-received, I think we should certainly plan on having another in 2008, associated with the Osaka IUCr Congress. Most of the comments I received (both from participants and from third parties) were complimentary, so I think the general form was probably about right, with a couple of provisos - (1) Attendees who were primarily developers (i.e. not crystallographers) who were thinking of entering crystallographic software development seemed to be more disappointed than satisfied (the lesson I learnt from this is that we can't cast the net too wide, and perhaps we shouldn't try to address this constituency). Those who are thinking of becoming developers who are currently "working crystallographers" seemed to be universally happy with thhe School as it was (at least, I didn't get a bad report from anyone). (2) We should certainly try to get the practical sessions sorted out well before the School - I think we were rescued from a shambles by the hard work and clear thinking provided by Ralf, George and Kevin. Since I was responsible for having created the shambles in the first place, I'm very grateful for their efforts. (3) I don't know how well the idea of presenting topics in a way which didn't divide up protein, chemical and powder crystallography worked. It's an idea I'm very keen on but I think that it requires a few things in order to be successful - (3a) the audience has to be aware that some techniques can be applicable to their own sub-field even if currently only implemented in another (3b) the lecturers have to deliver the subject in a way which is less obviously directed at a particular sub-field (3c) in-depth discussions of particular problems which arise in a particular sub-field should be avoided, since they appear irrelevant to members of the audience who don't have any intention of working in that sub-field With these in mind, I think it would be better to be able to (occasionally?) divide up into two or three streams. Unless you have every lecturer "on board" with these ideas you are bound to get problems when the lecturer decides to do his/her own thing if there are no parallel sessions. (4) My personal feeling is that "software sessions" where the participants use existing software are often of little value in training people to develop new software. Sessions like this can illustrate a point in development, but the School should not be aimed at training to use any particular crystallographic program. On the other hand, the use of existing crystallographic libraries etc can be a very useful thing, as can the use of scripts etc for chaining together functionality. (5) My gut feeling is that we should aim at "more of the same" - perhaps addressing some issues in greater depth. But the important thing is to identify the real target audience before, while and after making any decisions. My choice would be the "currently working crystallographers who want to move into crystallographic software development". (6) We need to identify sources of sponsorship to replace the EU funding that was obtained from Max-Inf2 - this will not be available for any event held outside the "European Economic Area". > 1 - The next Crystallographic Computing School > > 2 - Issues to be addressed by the computing commission > > ad1) Prior to the IUCr Florence meeting we organised a computing > school in Siena, close to Florence. This type of combining of > activities turns out to be very efficient. > > We will now have to start the planning of a next computing school. > Relevant questions are: > - Is a similar combination of school + congress possible/desirable > for the 2008 Osaka IUCr Congress ? > - What will be the carrying theme of the school ? > > ad2) Our commission member Lachlan Cranswick Edited an informative > newsletter in the previous 2002-2005 period. > Is this something to continue ? New ideas ? > > > > I hope that all commission members will share their views on the above > issues by sending their suggestions to this list: > > compcomm-l@iucr.org > > Best wishes > > Ton Spek > > Chairman of the IUCr Computing Commission > > -- > #=========================================================================== > # Prof. Dr. A.L.Spek, Laboratory of Crystal and Structural Chemistry # > # Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University. # > # (Kruytgebouw, room N801), Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands. # > # E-mail: a.l.spek@chem.uu.nl http://www.cryst.chem.uu.nl/ # > # http://www.cryst.chem.uu.nl/platon/ # > # anonymous ftp: xraysoft.chem.uu.nl # > # FAX : (31)-30-2533940 PHONE : (31)-30-2532538/2533/3902/3502 # > #=========================================================================== -- ----------------------- Lachlan M. D. Cranswick Contact outside working hours / Coordonnees en dehors des heures de travail: NEW E-mail / courriel: lc *at* bluehaze.com.au Home Tel: (613) 584-4226 Mobile/Cell: 613 401 3433 WWW: http://lachlan.bluehaze.com.au/ P.O. Box 2057, Deep River, Ontario, Canada, K0J 1P0 (please use clear titles in any Email - otherwise messages might accidentally get put in the SPAM list due to large amount of junk Email being received. If you don't get an expected reply to any messages, please try again.) (Essayez d'utiliser des titres explicites - sans quoi vos messages pourraient aboutir dans un dossier de rebuts, du fait de la quantite tres importante de pourriels recue. Si vous n'obtenez pas la reponse attendue, merci de bien vouloir renvoyer un message.) _______________________________________________ compcomm mailing list compcomm@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/compcomm
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster