[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[sdpd] Re: Publishing a Powder-Diffraction-based paper is hard sometimes
- To: sdpd...@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: [sdpd] Re: Publishing a Powder-Diffraction-based paper is hard sometimes
- From: "L_Solovyov" <l_solovyov...@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:31:38 -0000
- Delivered-to: lebail...@univ-lemans.fr
- Delivered-to: mailing list sdpd...@yahoogroups.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1240889521; bh=1P0K8K9GHW/G3JwMaisb4L15NPuGyShp1TTpp5+BR6Q=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=b7cr5PDD/frkQbqL/HakiRINfU4+GPGMh9I2Ljkl5zpiJdlrvXyGrUSEGEeHgXHHdwF1YV9QtgnM2zFW2IiY7Fuu43fB5iWLFkZIj7PHHfuvfl7vbFchNxXdh2S2PsEN
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=TY9SdySaYw2stJWEfHaQeyFLebE54CBszGKaM+I8t9BJ5QZZ82Qvn/PF4l1g/9zbgmDpbQWWWt3q5S35K4qKqIiFqfJR9O0A8sAY6ePK1rnCo1PdSv+uI1L307txnoKf;
- In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20090427144612.012fd1a0...@mel.univ-lemans.fr>
- List-id: <sdpd.yahoogroups.com>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:sdpd-unsubscribe...@yahoogroups.com>
- Mailing-list: list sdpd...@yahoogroups.com; contact sdpd-owner...@yahoogroups.com
- Reply-to: sdpd...@yahoogroups.com
- Sender: sdpd...@yahoogroups.com
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
I think that the referee's curiosity about omitted regions is not absolutely idle since overlooking "unexplained" reflections may well lead to wrong symmetry and structure determination.
Powder data deposition as supporting information would be the best practice
(even for single-crystal works :-).
Regards,
Leonid
--- In sdpd...@yahoogroups.com, Armel Le Bail <armel.le_bail...@...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Have you observed how some reviewers exigences look
> fool sometimes concerning manuscripts based on powder
> diffraction data ?
>
> "In fig. 2, there is a certain region omitted. This must be
> described somewhere in the manuscript."
> Well, you said in the text that a "a few extra-peaks could not
> be explained by larger cell parameters" and that "they may well
> indicate the presence of an unidentified impurity".
> But this was not enough for the referee. He wants a perfect job
> with everything explained...
>
> Have you an idea of the number of single-crystal based works
> that would be rejected if the referees were systematically
> requiring a powder pattern of the bulk from where was extracted
> the crystal, and explanations for all extra peaks ?-).
>
> Best,
>
> Armel
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:sdpd-digest...@yahoogroups.com
mailto:sdpd-fullfeatured...@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
sdpd-unsubscribe...@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/