[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [sdpd] XRDU:RIET: Review references for refining structures in too high a symmetry?
>Other papers similar to the situation in the ACA 2004 abstract of
>Clearfield, Bestaoui, Ouyang, Fredoueil, Bujoli appreciated.
>
>"Crystal Structure of Cd3(O3PC2H4CO2)2.2H2O : Influence of the Solid
>State NMR in the Structure Determination"
> http://www.hwi.buffalo.edu/ACA/ACA04/abstracts/text/W0313.pdf
>
>Lachlan
In the abstract, one can find :
"The systematic absences were consistent with P21 /c and P21"
Is there not a typo ? This would be understandable if the statement
was instead :
"The systematic absences were consistent with P21 /m and P21"
Because there is not any consistency between the systematic absences
of the P21 /c and P21 spacegroups...
So, if there was a typo, this is just the presence or not of an
inversion center which is in question.
If there is not a typo, then this would mean that the h0l with l=2n+1
which are unambiguous (with no overlapping) on the powder
pattern have zero intensity, explaining that first choice of the P21/c
space group. But, when selecting P21, it would be surprising if
all h0l with l=2n+1 wero fortuitously null.
In that later explanation telling that :
"The systematic absences were consistent with P21 /c and P21"
is too short (would need more explanation) and remains a nonsense.
Armel
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/UIYolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
sdpd-unsubscribe...@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/