[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sdpd] Divergent opinions

To: sdpd...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [sdpd] Divergent opinions
From: Armel Le Bail <alb...@cristal.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 08:47:15 +0100
Delivered-to: mailing list sdpd...@yahoogroups.com
In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20030109110757.00b73d90...@mel.univ-lemans.fr>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:sdpd-unsubscribe...@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list sdpd...@yahoogroups.com; contact sdpd-owner...@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: sdpd...@yahoogroups.com

Hi,

Already a second text at the "Divergent opinions in Powder
Diffraction" Web page, entitled :

"Is it possible to have only one standard for instrumental broadening?"
by Luca Lutterotti

http://www.cristal.org/opinions/

These two first texts are convergent rather than divergent...
After all, maybe there is a consensus here ? Anyway,
divergent opinions are welcome too.

Best

Armel


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

References:
- [sdpd] Divergent opinions
  - From: Armel Le Bail <alb...@cristal.org>

Prev by Date: [sdpd] Divergent opinions
Next by Date: [sdpd] size broadening and diffracting volume
Previous by thread: [sdpd] Divergent opinions
Next by thread: [sdpd] size broadening and diffracting volume
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread