[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sdpd] error measurements

To: sdpd...@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [sdpd] error measurements
From: Jaap Vente <jaap...@jade.mda.cinvestav.mx>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 14:06:40 -0600 (CST)
Delivered-to: mailing list sdpd...@egroups.com
In-reply-to: <01012318462576...@img.cryst.bbk.ac.uk>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:sdpd-unsubscribe...@egroups.com>
Mailing-list: list sdpd...@egroups.com; contact sdpd-owner...@egroups.com
Reply-to: sdpd...@egroups.com


Yes I understand all what Jeremy wants to say, even better, GSAS nowadays
does calculate the residuals with and without background substraction. And
what do I find, even with 'good' fits? A rather high number of nines for
the Rwp with background substraction. Of course this is not always the
case, but it does happen more often than desired.

Jaap



Jaap Vente
Cinvestav-IPN Unidad Merida
Departamento de Fisica Aplicada
Carretera Ant. a Progreso km 6
Apartado Postal #73 Cordemex
Merida, Yucatan, 97310
Mexico
Fax: +52 (9) 981 29 17
Tel: +52 (9) 981 29 60 ext 243/230
e-mail: jaap...@mda.cinvestav.mx
web: http://www.mda.cinvestav.mx/

References:
- Re: [sdpd] error measurements
  - From: cockcroft...@gordon.cryst.bbk.ac.uk

Prev by Date: Re: [sdpd] error measurements
Next by Date: RE: [sdpd] error measurements
Previous by thread: Re: [sdpd] error measurements
Next by thread: [sdpd] background
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread