Are there any comments, suggestions, etc on the following (especially grammer, spelling and expression?) This is using text that Vincent and I haved generated? If nothing to the negative - I assume it would be OK to get this on the IUCr Compcomm website? And then pass it by the general community for comment or discussion via the relevant newsgroups? Draft "IUCr Computing Commission's opinion on Software Patents" While it is important to provide legal protection to authors and corporations developing scientific software, it is the opinion of the IUCr Computing Commission that this protection should rely on existing copyright and trademark laws. It is the further opinion of the IUCr Computing Commission that software patents are a spurious fad and against the spirit of the patent laws. It is common knowledge that software patents go against the original spirit and letter of patent law; and that many present software patents are either trivial, or involve the patenting of prior art, and have only been passed due to respective Patent Offices not being competent to analyse them. Patents passed on software methods are only effective in discouraging and chilling the development of new scientific software. This can prevent scientific advances from individuals, academic institutions and small companies; as well as quench the spread of crystallographic knowledge. Software Patents are therefore damaging to the entire scientific community. The concluding opinion of the IUCr Computing Commission is that there should be strong discouragement with respect to Software Patents; and they should be viewed as an ethically illegitimate and morally reprehensible practise. ############ Links & Information **** European Patent Convention (Munich, 1973) : Article excluding explicitely patenting of "scientific theories and mathematical methods", and "programs for computers" : http://www.european-patent-office.org/legal/epc/e/ar52.html **** Sites providing information on software patents (why they should not be used) http://swpat.ffii.org/patents/index.en.html (Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure, European-based) Notably see the Horror Gallery: http://swpat.ffii.org/patents/index.en.html http://www.eurolinux.org/ the eurolinux petition, and information on how the software patent idea is progressing in Europe. http://lpf.ai.mit.edu/ League for Programming Freedom **** Known patents (pending or not) relevant for crystallography - Marching cubes (3d display of mesh-electronic density almost always uses it) - genetic algorithm for ab initio structure solution from powder diffraction data. - an indexation algorithm for powder patterns **** Some infamous software patents - Hyperlink patent from British Telecom. It has recently been rejected by a court, otherwise BT could sue every author of a web page... - gif patent (if your software produces gifs, you're infringing on a patent) : http://burnallgifs.org/ - jpeg patent (you have to pay if you produce jpeg..): http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,53981,00.html http://www.jpeg.org/newsrel1.html - the technique of using exclusive-or to write a cursor onto a screen (US patent 4,197,590), etc... http://www.bustpatents.com/ (not only software) **** Just to show how surreal some patents (not software related) can be, the "sideways swinging on a swing" US patent #6,368,227: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1 &u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1='6,368,227'.WKU.&OS=PN/6,368,227&RS =PN/6,368,227 ----------------------- Lachlan M. D. Cranswick Collaborative Computational Project No 14 (CCP14) for Single Crystal and Powder Diffraction Birkbeck University of London and Daresbury Synchrotron Laboratory Postal Address: CCP14 - School of Crystallography, Birkbeck College, Malet Street, Bloomsbury, WC1E 7HX, London, UK Tel: (+44) 020 7631 6850 Fax: (+44) 020 7631 6803 E-mail: l.m.d.cranswick@dl.ac.uk Room: B091 WWW: http://www.ccp14.ac.uk/
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster